Hackers on the Horizon: Why Cybersecurity Funding Can’t Wait

Seth Johnson
Risk Management Consultant & Cybersecurity Specialist, Charles Taylor
background image

The dynamic nature of the cyber threat landscape demands that public service organizations have a comprehensive understanding of evolving risks. Cybercriminals continually refine their methods, from ransomware attacks that encrypt critical data to stealthy data breaches that compromise sensitive information. As technology advances, so do the tools at the disposal of malicious actors. Studies have shown that attacks on public sector organizations are increasing, and many are not adequately prepared to face the threat.

Public entities, being custodians of vast amounts of sensitive data, find themselves at the crossroads of heightened cyber threats. Government agencies and municipal organizations are prime targets for cybercriminals seeking to exploit vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure. The impact of a successful breach extends beyond operational disruptions; it erodes public trust. Public entities must allocate funds to fortify their cyber defenses, recognizing that the stakes are not only financial but also involve maintaining the public's confidence in their ability to safeguard information.

Beyond the immediate consequences, the compromise of public entities can have cascading effects on national security and citizen safety. Critical infrastructure, controlled by government bodies, is integral to the functioning of a society. Cyber-attacks targeting public entities may aim not only to steal information but also to disrupt essential services, posing a direct threat to public safety. Therefore, cybersecurity funding becomes not just a safeguard for organizational data but a crucial measure for upholding the overall stability and security of a nation.

The regulatory landscape around data protection has become increasingly stringent, necessitating public entities stay in compliance with evolving standards. Non-compliance not only invites legal consequences but also exposes these organizations to heightened cyber threats. Cybersecurity funding should align with the commitment to meeting regulatory standards, ensuring that the organization not only avoids penalties but also maintains a secure posture in an environment of evolving regulations.

As regulations evolve, so do the tactics of cybercriminals aiming to exploit gaps in compliance. Adequate cybersecurity funding allows public entities not only to meet current regulatory requirements but also to anticipate future changes. Proactive investment in compliance-focused cybersecurity measures positions organizations to adapt swiftly to regulatory shifts, reducing the risk of non-compliance and the associated legal and financial repercussions.

As public entities develop their defense strategy, a critical factor to consider is the human element. Employees, often the first line of defense, can unwittingly become points of vulnerability. An untrained workforce may fall prey to phishing attempts or unknowingly introduce malware into the system. Building a culture of cybersecurity awareness not only fortifies defenses but also aligns with broader cybersecurity strategy and proactive investment measures.

Rather than viewing cybersecurity funding as a sunk cost, public entities should perceive it as a strategic investment. Advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence for threat detection and response, threat intelligence systems and continuous monitoring, form the pillars of a robust cybersecurity strategy in tandem with an empowered and vigilant work force. These strategic investments position organizations to not only defend against known threats but also adapt swiftly to emerging cyber risks and regulatory changes, enhancing overall cyber resilience. As public entities face the constant challenge of safeguarding their digital assets, a foresighted and well-funded cybersecurity approach is non-negotiable.

*The views and opinions expressed in the Public Risk Management Association (PRIMA) blogs are those of each respective author. The views and opinions do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of PRIMA.*

By: Seth Johnson
Risk Management Consultant & Cybersecurity Specialist, Charles Taylor

Seth is a risk management consultant and cybersecurity specialist for Charles Taylor. Charles Taylor is the general administrator of the Wisconsin County Mutual Group (WCMG). The WCMG insures over 280 municipalities and school districts across Wisconsin, providing a complete suite of management services. Seth works with public entities to assist relevant stakeholders in understanding risk. After spending nearly a decade working in strategic, operational, compliance and technology risk management, Seth knows how to successfully assist organizations in integrating risk management into significant activities and functions. With a core background in risk management, Seth is in the process of obtaining a Bachelor of Science degree in computer science, emphasizing cybersecurity.

Sign Up for Our Education Newsletter

You Might Also Be Interested In