Marijuana and the Drug-Free Workplace

Sarah R. Schmitz, Esq.
Claims Attorney, OneBeacon Government Risks
background image

Marijuana is one of the hottest topics being discussed today. Currently, 24 states and the District of Columbia have legalized medical marijuana in some form and four states and the District of Columbia have legalized the use of recreational marijuana. However, due to these changes in legislation in many states, employers are left feeling hazy. Often, employers are unclear about whether they can still enforce a drug-free environment. That answer depends on where you live.

Under federal law, marijuana remains illegal and is classified by the Controlled Substances Act as a Schedule 1 drug. For that reason, employees cannot find federal protection for medical marijuana use under the Americans with Disabilities Act, which has an exception for “illegal drug use.”

Each state law is very unique. A majority of states do not address medical marijuana in the workplace and courts have been reluctant to provide these employees any protection against termination. In at least nine states (Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New York and Rhode Island), the medical marijuana statutes specifically provide job protection to employees who use medical marijuana. The specific state protections range from classifying medical marijuana as a “disability” and triggering the interactive process and possible reasonable accommodations to allowing an employer to enforce a zero-tolerance policy and discipline a medical marijuana holder for violating that company policy.

The most recent case attempt to find protection for employees in the majority of states that do not provide specific protections in the statute was the case of Coats v. Dish Network, LLC. The Colorado Supreme Court held that the Lawful Use Statute, a statute intended to protect workers who engage in legal activities during non-work hours that are not condoned by their employers, did not protect medical marijuana users. Marijuana remains illegal under federal law, without any exception for medicinal purposes, or any express allowance for a state to legalize it for any such purpose statute, and thus was not a “lawful” activity.

If you receive notice of a failed drug screen and your employee presents a medical marijuana card, do you know what to do? To clear the haze, work closely with the risk management, insurance and legal teams to ensure that policies and procedures comply with your specific state law and your options.

Maintaining clear policies and procedures is the most proactive way to address this emerging issue. Examine drug testing policies, any drug-free workplace rules, whether there is federal oversight on any of your operations or you have safety sensitive positions.

When you decide on the plan that is right for your public entity, ensure consistency by publicizing the adoption of the policies in your personnel manual or employee handbook.

For more information, the PRIMA Cybrary may include sample policies in which risk managers can refer to as a resource.

By: Sarah R. Schmitz, Esq.
Claims Attorney, OneBeacon Government Risks

Summary of Qualifications

Sarah Schmitz is a Claims Attorney at OneBeacon Government Risks at its headquarters in Plymouth, Minnesota. Prior to joining OneBeacon, Sarah practiced at Minneapolis-based Meagher & Geer, LLP, where she focused her practice on insurance coverage and real estate. She also served two terms on the Minnetonka Planning Commission.

Sarah is a past panelist and presenter at Claims Litigation Management National Conference (CLM), the Professional Liability Research Bureau (PLRB) Regional Conferences, and the American Conference Institute National EPL Seminar, and PRIMA's Annual Conference. Sarah has also co-authored portions of the Minnesota Insurance Law Deskbook, as well as articles in Claims Magazine, Public Risk and the Hennepin County Lawyer.

Schmitz graduated cum laude from Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota. During law school, she served as an editor of the Hamline Law Review and published Preventing Mudslinging in Chambers: Alternatives After the Demise of the Announce Clause in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White.

Responsibilities

Sarah currently handles a wide range of claims including employment, law enforcement, and public officials errors and omissions claims brought against municipal entities. In her seven years with OneBeacon, she has also handled legal malpractice, real estate errors and omissions, employment and directors and officer’s claims.

Education

J.D., Hamline University School of Law

Sign Up for Our Education Newsletter

You Might Also Be Interested In